By Youngmi Jeong
Applicatives is anxious with the syntax of buildings that include arguments that go beyond the conventional subject-object characterization, and the way the syntax of such structures yields the interpretive results that past study has pointed out. on the empirical point this quantity treatments the inadequacies and boundaries of earlier bills via featuring a extra nuanced view of the entire elements that input into the syntax and semantics of applicatives. on the theoretical point, this ebook bargains empirical arguments for varied theoretical thoughts at the moment entertained within the minimalist application, between which move into theta-position, a number of agree, anti-locality, and a truly derivational view on successive cyclic stream.
Read Online or Download Applicatives : structure and interpretation from a minimalist perspective PDF
Similar grammar books
Geert Booij's well known textbook examines how phrases are shaped, compounded, and inflected in numerous languages. It indicates how, whilst, and why to take advantage of tools of morphological research and explains how morphology pertains to syntax, phonology, and semantics. the writer considers the common features of morphology and the way those are mirrored within the workings of brain.
This can be a textbook of a primary style, designed to introduce scholars to the elemental innovations of syntax. Professor Matthews doesn't expound the version of anyone theoretical tuition; nor does he try out a simple synthesis of already released paintings. He believes that scholars have a lot to achieve from the descriptive traditions of person languages in addition to from theorists.
Mostly, a speaker makes use of a primary individual singular pronoun (in English, I, me, mine, myself) to consult himself or herself. to consult a unmarried addressee, a speaker makes use of moment individual pronouns ( you, yours, yourself). yet occasionally 3rd individual nonpronominal DPs are used to consult the speaker--for instance, this reporter, yours truly--or to the addressee-- my lord, the baroness, Madam ( Is Madam no longer feeling good?
The ascendance of communique applied sciences comparable to the net has accentuated the necessity to enhance entry, manipulation and translation of written language. one of many major targets of researchers within the box of computational linguistics is to create courses that positioned to exploit wisdom of human language in pursuit of know-how that may conquer the various stumbling blocks within the interplay among human and machine.
Additional info for Applicatives : structure and interpretation from a minimalist perspective
But the English ditransitive structure is semantically/thematically richer. ’ This is the thematic relation that Pietroski (2003:201) focuses on. He captures the latter by assuming that DO is generated in the specifier of an intermediate Larsonian VP-shell, whose head indicates transfer, and the lower shell expresses the Goal relation and contains IO. Although Pietroski’s semantic characterization is, I think, correct, it requires that DO start off higher than IO, in a position that we have characterized above as a high applicative.
Languages in which all arguments satisfy their case requirements, but nevertheless do not license Themepassivization. I will return below and even more so in chapter 2 to this extremely rigid, exclusively phrase-structural/locality-based view on variation in the domain of applicatives. 7 Problems for the consensus In this section I point out several problems that arise in the context of purely locality-based accounts advocated by Anagnostopoulou (2003), Ura (1996), and McGinnis (2001, 2004). I pay special attention to McGinnis (2001, 2004) here as her attempt strikes me as the most promising and potentially most explanatory among the analyses forming the consensus discussed above.
So, we face a syntax-semantics mismatch, or Phrase Structure paradox PRELIMINARIES 29 – a “constituency conflict”, as McGinnis calls it. Constituency conflicts of this sort pose a serious problem for any approach equating syntactic structure and semantic/thematic relations. In addition to these syntactic problems for the consensus, I would like to mention the fact that the semantic characterization of applicatives that McGinnis relies on, viz. Pylkkänen (2002), appears to be incomplete. Here is what I mean.