By Ruqaiya Hasan †, Carmel Cloran, David G. Butt
This quantity makes a speciality of the relation among conception and outline by means of analyzing facets of transitivity in numerous languages. Transitivity — or case grammar, to exploit the preferred time period — has constantly occupied a centre-stage place in linguistics, now not least as a result of its supposedly privileged relation to states of affairs within the genuine global. utilizing a systemic useful standpoint, the 10 papers during this quantity make contributions to this scholarship by way of targeting the transitivity styles in language because the expression of the experiential metafunction. via a learn of alternative languages — English, Dutch, German, Finnish, chinese language and Pitjantjatjara — the participants supply sensible descriptions of many of the different types of technique, their members and conditions, together with phenomena corresponding to di-transitivity, causativity, the get-passive, and so forth. With the relation among theories and outlines operating in the course of the ten chapters of this quantity as occasionally an overt and occasionally a covert subject matter, the chapters element to the character of the linguistic truth that's associated ineluctably at the one hand to the character of the idea and at the different to the audio system’ event of the area during which they live.
The majority of papers incorporated within the quantity derive from the nineteenth foreign Systemic practical Congress at Macquarie University.
Read Online or Download Functional Descriptions: Theory in Practice PDF
Similar grammar books
Geert Booij's renowned textbook examines how phrases are shaped, compounded, and inflected in numerous languages. It exhibits how, while, and why to exploit equipment of morphological research and explains how morphology pertains to syntax, phonology, and semantics. the writer considers the common features of morphology and the way those are mirrored within the workings of brain.
It is a textbook of a primary sort, designed to introduce scholars to the fundamental recommendations of syntax. Professor Matthews doesn't expound the version of anyone theoretical institution; nor does he try out a simple synthesis of already released paintings. He believes that scholars have a lot to realize from the descriptive traditions of person languages in addition to from theorists.
Generally, a speaker makes use of a primary individual singular pronoun (in English, I, me, mine, myself) to consult himself or herself. to consult a unmarried addressee, a speaker makes use of moment individual pronouns ( you, yours, yourself). yet occasionally 3rd individual nonpronominal DPs are used to consult the speaker--for instance, this reporter, yours truly--or to the addressee-- my lord, the baroness, Madam ( Is Madam now not feeling good?
The ascendance of communique applied sciences similar to the net has accentuated the necessity to enhance entry, manipulation and translation of written language. one of many major pursuits of researchers within the box of computational linguistics is to create courses that positioned to take advantage of wisdom of human language in pursuit of expertise that could triumph over the numerous stumbling blocks within the interplay among human and machine.
Extra info for Functional Descriptions: Theory in Practice
265). In his description of the Chinese complement, McDonald turns to SFL, for he believes that it is "good at questioning the accepted traditional views of grammar", and the crucial advance provided for him by the theory is the disentangling of an experiential and a textual role. The grammatical debate has, McDonald argues, confused "a kind of 'extension' to the main verb" with the textual role of unmarked New. The ability to separate out these two roles — the experiential and the textual — enables McDonald to discriminate between "disparate clause ele ments" which have typically been grouped together due to their "textual similarity" (p.
7. How big is a grammar? The semogenic operations performed by a grammar are, obviously, extremely complex. Neuroscientists explain the evolution of the mammalian brain, including that of homo sapiens, in terms of its modelling the increasingly complex relationships between the organism and its environment. This expla nation foregrounds the construal of experience (the "ideational" metafunction); so we need to make explicit also its bringing about the increasingly complex interactions between one organism and another (the "interpersonal" metafunction).
Within semiotic sys tems, those with a grammar in them are more complex than those without. Semiotic systems first evolve in the form of what Edelman (1992) calls "primary consciousness". They evolve as inventories of signs, a sign being a content/expression pair. Systems of this kind, which I have called primary semiotics, are found among numerous species: all higher animals, including our household pets; and such a system is also developed by human infants in the first year of their lives — I referred to this as the "protolanguage" (Halliday 1975).