By Hubert Cuyckens, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte
This quantity goals to reach at a fine-grained and grammar-based figuring out of the notions of (inter-)subjectivity and (inter-)subjectification of their software to grammaticalization study. when it comes to linguistic conception, place is taken vis-a-vis present methods to (inter-)subjectification that are both too slim or too normal by means of addressing questions: (i) what's the relation among (inter-)subjectivity and pragmatics, and (ii) on what grounds can subjective and intersubjective meanings be extraordinary? within the descriptive sections of the quantity, those theoretical issues are faced with wide analytical, and infrequently additionally quantitative, research of empirical information regularly from English but additionally from Romance languages. the focal point in those case reviews is at the analytical and diachronic kinfolk among subjectivity and intersubjectivity, with specific emphasis at the query how linguistic syntagms may well shift in the direction of the expression of meanings of which the hearer is an important half. The domain names coated contain adverbials and modals, but in addition the noun word, up to now a comparatively under-researched region in grammaticalization experiences. jointly those 3 parts make sure large verification of present hypotheses in regards to the relative order during which subjectification and intersubjectification ensue. This quantity is especially of curiosity to researchers and graduate scholars with a distinct curiosity in subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, and with a basic curiosity in language switch. the quantity can also be welcomed by way of sensible linguists (in a extensive sense), because it is the 1st to carry eclectic functionalists' reflections to undergo so explicitly on grammaticalization.
Read Online or Download Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization PDF
Similar grammar books
Geert Booij's well known textbook examines how phrases are shaped, compounded, and inflected in numerous languages. It exhibits how, while, and why to take advantage of tools of morphological research and explains how morphology pertains to syntax, phonology, and semantics. the writer considers the common features of morphology and the way those are mirrored within the workings of brain.
It is a textbook of a basic sort, designed to introduce scholars to the fundamental innovations of syntax. Professor Matthews doesn't expound the version of anyone theoretical institution; nor does he try out an easy synthesis of already released paintings. He believes that scholars have a lot to realize from the descriptive traditions of person languages in addition to from theorists.
Quite often, a speaker makes use of a primary individual singular pronoun (in English, I, me, mine, myself) to consult himself or herself. to consult a unmarried addressee, a speaker makes use of moment individual pronouns ( you, yours, yourself). yet occasionally 3rd individual nonpronominal DPs are used to consult the speaker--for instance, this reporter, yours truly--or to the addressee-- my lord, the baroness, Madam ( Is Madam now not feeling good?
The ascendance of conversation applied sciences similar to the web has accentuated the necessity to enhance entry, manipulation and translation of written language. one of many major pursuits of researchers within the box of computational linguistics is to create courses that placed to exploit wisdom of human language in pursuit of know-how that could conquer the numerous stumbling blocks within the interplay among human and desktop.
Additional resources for Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization
I use the term “inventory” in preference to “lexicon”, since the latter invokes only lexical items, while “inventory” is a neutral term covering lexical and grammatical items (Brinton and Traugott 2005: 90). 32 Elizabeth Closs Traugott Of course, in a general sense the very fact of communicating with another person entails general intersubjectivity. The “I” is constituted in part by conceptualizing the other member of the communicative dyad “you” (Benveniste 1971; Lyons 1994) and discourse is communicatively successful only if speakers pay attention to audience needs, and if “mutual manifestness” or “mutual management” is worked on (Schiffrin 1990; Nuyts 2001; Verhagen 2005).
Langacker, Ronald W. 1998 On subjectification and grammaticalization. ), 71–89. Stanford: CSLI. Langacker, Ronald W. 1999 Losing control: grammaticization, subjectification, and transparency. ), 147–175. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Langacker, Ronald W. 2002 Deixis and subjectivity. ), 1–28. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Langacker, Ronald W. 2003 Extreme subjectification: English tense and modals. ), 3–26. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 24 Hubert Cuyckens, Kristin Davidse and Lieven Vandelanotte Langacker, Ronald W.
Lyons, John 1982 Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, Robert J. ), 101–124. New York: Wiley. McGregor, William B. 1997 Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Narrog, Heiko 2005 Modality, mood, and change of modal meanings – a new perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 16: 677–731. Nuyts, Jan 2001 Epistemic Modality, Language and Conceptualization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Nuyts, Jan 2005 Modality: Overview and linguistic issues.